←IndexThe Reconstruction of Religious Thought in Islam

Lecture 4: The Human Ego — His Freedom and Immortality

Section 7 of 13

Freedom and determinism

Section summary

In brief

Iqbal opens the question of freedom by diagnosing why modern psychology was bound to reach deterministic conclusions: it modelled mind on the atomism of physics and thereby built mechanism into its premises. Drawing on Gestalt psychology's concept of insight, he argues that purposive action involves a vision of a future that physiology cannot explain — and then makes his most daring move: the causal chain itself is the ego's own construction, a tool through which it 'acquires and amplifies its freedom.'

Section 6 established that the ego emerges from the physical order as 'yet another make' — a genuinely novel reality that arises from the coordination of lower-order experiential centres but cannot be reduced to them. The body is the accumulated habit of the soul, matter is a colony of low-order egos, and the Ultimate Ego is immanent in the process that produces ever-higher forms of selfhood. But this account immediately raises a question that Section 7 now confronts: if the ego emerges from the natural order and is continuously shaped by it — if 'streams of causality flow into it from Nature and from it to Nature' — then is the ego truly free? Or is its apparent self-determination merely a sophisticated form of natural mechanism?

The section advances through two tightly connected movements. First, Iqbal states the problem with precision and then identifies its source. The mechanistic interpretation of human action treats deliberation as a conflict of motives conceived as external forces — 'gladiator-like, on the arena of the mind' — with the final choice determined by whichever force is strongest. This model reduces the ego to a passive arena in which impersonal forces contend, and it arises, Iqbal argues, from psychology's 'slavish imitation of physical sciences.' By modelling consciousness on the pattern of atomic physics — treating mental life as a succession of discrete units (sensations, ideas) subject to mechanical laws — psychology imported a framework that was bound to produce a mechanistic conclusion. The determinism was built into the method, not discovered in the phenomena.

Second, Iqbal identifies a countervailing development: the emergence of Gestalt psychology (Configuration Psychology) in Germany, which reveals the fact of 'insight' — the ego's capacity to apprehend the relational structure of a situation and to act toward a goal that is not yet actual but anticipated. Purposive action involves a 'vision of a future situation' that no physiological account can explain, because physiology deals only with what is present, not with what is envisaged. The section's culminating argument is that the causal chain itself — the framework of cause and effect through which we interpret the natural world — is 'an artificial construction of the ego for its own purposes.' Causality is not a prison in which the ego is trapped; it is a tool the ego has built to navigate its environment. In constructing, understanding, and mastering the causal order, the ego does not submit to determinism. It 'acquires and amplifies its freedom.'

This section is pivotal within the lecture's arc because it shifts the problem of freedom from a metaphysical puzzle to an epistemological reframing. The question is not whether the ego is exempt from natural causation but whether natural causation, properly understood, is the ego's own instrument rather than its master.

Original text

This view of the matter raises a very important question. We have seen that the ego is not something rigid. It organizes itself in time, and is formed and disciplined by its own experience. It is further clear that streams of causality flow into it from Nature and from it to Nature. Does the ego then determine its own activity? If so, how is the self-determination of the ego related to the determinism of the spatio-temporal order? Is personal causality a special kind of causality, or only a disguised form of the mechanism of Nature? It is claimed that the two kinds of determinism are not mutually exclusive and that the scientific method is equally applicable to human action. The human act of deliberation is understood to be a conflict of motives which are conceived, not as the ego's own present or inherited tendencies of action or inaction, but as so many external forces fighting one another, gladiator-like, on the arena of the mind. Yet the final choice is regarded as a fact determined by the strongest force, and not by the resultant of contending motives, like a purely physical effect.²⁹

I am, however, firmly of the opinion that the controversy between the advocates of Mechanism and Freedom arises from a wrong view of intelligent action which modern psychology, unmindful of its own independence as a science, possessing a special set of facts to observe, was bound to take on account of its slavish imitation of physical sciences. The view that ego-activity is a succession of thoughts and ideas, ultimately resolvable to units of sensations, is only another form of atomic materialism which forms the basis of modern science. Such a view could not but raise a strong presumption in favour of a mechanistic interpretation of consciousness.

There is, however, some relief in thinking that the new German psychology, known as Configuration Psychology,³⁰ may succeed in securing the independence of Psychology as a science, just as the theory of Emergent Evolution may eventually bring about the independence of Biology. This newer German psychology teaches us that a careful study of intelligent behaviour discloses the fact of 'insight' over and above the mere succession of sensations.³¹ This 'insight' is the ego's appreciation of temporal, spatial, and causal relation of things — the choice, that is to say of data, in a complex whole, in view of the goal or purpose which the ego has set before itself for the time being. It is this sense of striving in the experience of purposive action and the success which I actually achieve in reaching my 'ends' that convince me of my efficiency as a personal cause. The essential feature of a purposive act is its vision of a future situation which does not appear to admit any explanation in terms of Physiology.

The truth is that the causal chain wherein we try to find a place for the ego is itself an artificial construction of the ego for its own purposes. The ego is called upon to live in a complex environment, and he cannot maintain his life in it without reducing it to a system which would give him some kind of assurance as to the behaviour of things around him. The view of his environment as a system of cause and effect is thus an indispensable instrument of the ego, and not a final expression of the nature of Reality. Indeed in interpreting Nature in this way the ego understands and masters its environment, and thereby acquires and amplifies its freedom.³²

← Previous

6. The emergence of the ego and the mind-body problem

8. Prayer as escape from mechanism

Original text