Iqbal presents Gökalp's demand for women's equality in marriage, divorce, and inheritance not as a departure from the Qur'an but as a correction of the 'interpretation of the Qur'an by the learned.' He then celebrates Turkey alone among Muslim nations as having 'shaken off its dogmatic slumber,' and grounds the entire case for legal evolution in ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb's declaration 'The Book of God is sufficient for us.'
Section 7 presented Ziya Gökalp's vision of an International Islam — a 'League of Nations' constituted by independent, self-strengthened Muslim republics — and his Comtian adaptation of the relationship between religion and science, concluding with the controversial proposal to displace Arabic with Turkish in worship and Qur'anic education. Section 8 now turns to the most socially radical dimension of Gökalp's programme: the reform of family law, particularly the demand for equality between men and women in divorce, separation, and inheritance. Iqbal presents this as the logical consequence of the 'spirit of Islam' rather than as a departure from it, and closes the section with one of his most forceful declarations about Turkey's unique position in the modern Muslim world and the capacity of Islamic law to evolve.
The section advances through three movements. First, Iqbal presents Gökalp's poetry on the status of women — lines that challenge the traditional juristic interpretation of Qur'anic inheritance and marriage provisions and demand equality as a precondition for national and familial health. Gökalp's rhetorical strategy is notable: he does not argue against the Qur'an but against the 'interpretation of the Qur'an by the learned,' framing the inequality of women not as a divine prescription but as a scholarly error. Second, Iqbal pivots from Gökalp's specific proposals to a broader evaluation of Turkey's significance: Turkey alone among Muslim nations 'has shaken off its dogmatic slumber,' has 'passed from the ideal to the real,' and is 'on the way to creating new values' rather than 'mechanically repeating old values.' Third, and most importantly, Iqbal poses the question that governs the remainder of Lecture VI: 'whether the Law of Islam is capable of evolution' — and answers it with the invocation of ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb's declaration at the Prophet's deathbed: 'The Book of God is sufficient for us.'
This closing move is architecturally decisive. By grounding the entire argument for legal evolution in the authority of ʿUmar — the second caliph, one of the most revered figures in Sunnī Islam, and by Iqbal's description 'the first critical and independent mind in Islam' — Iqbal anchors the most radical implications of ijtihād (including women's legal equality) in the deepest stratum of Islamic authority. The argument is not that Islam must be modernised from outside but that Islam's own founding generation modelled the critical independence that modernity demands.